Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin expressed that users are not obligated to share his views on various aspects like politics or application frameworks to utilize the Ethereum network. He argued that differing opinions do not mandate a consensus on all topics.

“Corposlop” Isn’t Censorship

In a detailed post on X, Buterin stated that he does not represent the entire Ethereum ecosystem. He characterized Ethereum as a decentralized platform focused on permissionless engagement and resistance to censorship. This ensures anyone can use the network regardless of individual opinions or those held by the Ethereum Foundation or developers. He criticized the term “corposlop” for labeling applications he disapproves of, asserting that it does not constitute censorship. Buterin emphasized that free speech enables individuals to critique while others may respond in kind.

He further dismissed the idea of “pretend neutrality,” where people present themselves as impartial while failing to articulate their views. He urged that neutrality should primarily apply to protocols but not to individuals, who should actively express their principles and voice their concerns regarding agendas that contradict them.

Hollow Uses of “Freedom” in Tech

Buterin noted that valuing freedom while limiting it to technical decisions, disconnected from broader life aspects, is not only impractical but also empty. He stated that a decentralized protocol should not be seen as belonging to a single metaverse, highlighting the nebulous boundaries that often see individuals aligning on some issues while disagreeing on others.

These latest remarks come after he previously sided with Bitcoin maximalists regarding concerns over digital sovereignty. He criticized current internet trends moving towards corporate-controlled systems diminishing user autonomy and privacy, arguing that sovereignty is not merely about resisting governmental oversight but also about defending user rights from profit-driven entities.