
If you think that wrapping a traditional asset in a blockchain token allows one to bypass securities laws, you might want to reconsider. David Hirsch, who heads the SEC’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, made it clear during a talk at Yale: tokenization does not alter the fundamental nature of the asset.
He commented on the increasing trend of converting physical assets like stocks or bonds into digital tokens on a blockchain. While this concept appears innovative, the SEC maintains that it is fundamentally the same product. Hirsch expressed that a security is a security, regardless of its packaging.
Tokenization Doesn’t Equal Exemption
The cryptocurrency sector has adopted tokenization as a means to reinvent finance. It enhances asset portability, potentially reduces costs, and allows for continual trading. Nonetheless, Hirsch cautioned that technological advancements do not alter legal stipulations. A bond or equity digitized remains subject to its status as a regulated financial instrument.
Source: Shutterstock
He likened it to placing a new label on an object; you can change its appearance but not its essence. This encapsulates how the SEC perceives tokenized assets. If they fulfill the legal criteria of a security, they will be treated as such.
Institutions Are Observing
This development is significant as tokenized finance begins to attract major industry players. Companies like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton are investigating tokenized securities and money market funds. Various crypto platforms are building businesses on the premise that tokenization might create a more adaptable legal framework.
However, Hirsch’s remarks temper that optimism. He noted that the SEC is keeping a vigilant eye and will enforce the same legal standards to these new creations as it does with traditional offerings: registration, disclosure, and investor protections are still applicable, even when assets exist on a blockchain.
Enforcement Is Not Slowing Down
Despite some recent court losses, Hirsch made it clear that the SEC will not relent. He pointed out the agency continues to initiate new enforcement actions and is monitoring firms attempting to manipulate the rules. Even businesses striving for compliance must be wary about how they interpret legal limitations surrounding tokenization.
Hirsch recognized the rapid pace at which the crypto industry evolves but reminded all involved that the law remains unchanged. Innovation does not exempt one from regulatory obligations.
What Does This Mean?
For startups, developers, and institutional entities experimenting with tokenized assets, the takeaway is straightforward. New technology does not alter existing regulations. Whether dealing with a digital token or a physical stock certificate, the legal treatment remains consistent if it qualifies as a security.
Tokenization might provide benefits of efficiency and accessibility, but it does not grant any preferential treatment. The rules remain in effect, and the SEC is ensuring that everyone is aware of this.
DISCOVER: Next Crypto to Explode in 2025
Join Us: Latest Market Updates on Discord
Key Takeaways
- SEC official David Hirsch asserts tokenized assets are still governed by securities regulations if they meet legal definitions.
- Tokenizing traditional assets does not change their treatment under U.S. law.
- The SEC will apply the same rules to tokenized products, inclusive of registration and disclosure necessities.
- Major firms exploring tokenized finance, such as BlackRock and Franklin Templeton, are under regulatory scrutiny.
- The SEC is ramping up enforcement, stressing that technological progress does not negate established rules.