What You Need to Know:
You are reading Crypto Long & Short, our weekly newsletter offering insights, news, and analysis tailored for the professional investor. Sign up here to receive it directly in your inbox every Wednesday.
In August, digital assets faced a slight retreat from a longer-term upward trend. Bitcoin experienced a decline of approximately 6.5%, marking its first monthly downturn since March, even after achieving a new peak of $125,000. Conversely, Ether showed strength, rising nearly 19% and claiming about 13% of the overall market capitalization. This shift from Bitcoin to Ether was evident in ETFs, where Bitcoin resources faced rare net withdrawals, revealing some profit-taking after a strong rally this year, while Ether ETFs saw significant inflows, driving assets to record sizes. Consequently, Bitcoin’s market dominance fell to its lowest since January, resulting in a relatively flat total market capitalization for digital currencies.
Despite this market performance, trading activity remained heightened. Spot trading volumes remained above their twelve-month average, a rarity in the typically quieter summer months, and the derivatives market was equally vibrant. The open interest in Bitcoin and Ether options reached new peaks, with August witnessing record trading volumes of $145 billion in BTC options. While implied volatility remained fairly stable, it showed a slight uptick toward the end of the month, suggesting that the options market might not fully capture the existing risks.
While Bitcoin took a pause, gold thrived, propelled by factors like lowered rate expectations, steady core inflation, widening trade deficits, and political uncertainties, reaching new highs. Dismissal of Fed Governor Lisa Cook by the Trump administration raised concerns about the Federal Reserve’s long-term independence. Even though Treasury yields remained stable, gold, as a hedge against inflation and systemic risks, experienced a significant rise. Interestingly, Bitcoin’s value dipped on the same day as this update.
This scenario raises the ongoing debate: does Bitcoin rightfully earn the title of “digital gold”? Arguments in favor include its scarcity and libertarian origins; however, the statistics present a diverse picture. Short-term correlations between Bitcoin and gold have fluctuated around 12% and 16% over 30- and 90-day intervals, indicating inconsistent moves together. Yet, since 2024, the average correlation over 180 days has notably increased to about 60%, suggesting that the ‘digital gold’ narrative is progressively garnering acceptance among investors.
It’s essential to remember that gold also has a flawed history as a macroeconomic and inflation hedge. Although it has proven to maintain purchasing power better than many other assets over decades, it doesn’t track consumer prices consistently month-to-month. Some research posits that gold acts as a refuge during extreme market stress, yet this is not always the case, as reflected in its variable connection with the VIX index.
For Bitcoin, this narrative is still unfolding. Some investors perceive it as a technology asset, while others consider it as an emerging macro hedge, with the latter likely to be more enduring over time. Given Bitcoin’s restricted scalability and lack of flexibility, it seems less likely to become a multi-functional platform compared to other blockchains. Its long-term appeal is based on scarcity and neutrality, similar to gold’s role in finance.
Ultimately, narratives take time to solidify. Gold took centuries to gain wide acceptance as a value store; Bitcoin, only 16 years old, has remarkably reached high levels of recognition and adoption. While current data may not fully validate the ‘digital gold’ comparison, dismissing it is premature. History indicates that Bitcoin’s story is still in progress.
