A recent debate between Ethereum’s co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Anatoly Yakovenko, who founded Solana, has garnered significant attention within the crypto community on X. The discussion revolved around whether Ethereum’s Layer 2 (L2) networks provide genuine security.

Security and Centralization Risks

Buterin defended the L2 framework on X, stating that even in cases where 51% of validators would collude or encounter a software bug, theft of user assets is not possible. He acknowledged, however, that if the validator set was entrusted to undertake tasks outside the chain’s jurisdiction, collusion could lead to misinformation with no means of recourse.

Yakovenko rebutted this viewpoint by challenging the notion that L2s inherit Ethereum’s security, stating, “The promise of L2s != the reality of L2s.” He noted that, five years into the L2 roadmap, Wormhole ETH on Solana encounters the same significant risks as ETH on Base, while yielding similar returns for ETH L1 stakers.

He further proposed the idea of creating a dedicated bridge enabling Ethereum to function as a layer-2 on Solana, facilitating the seamless movement of assets between both networks. This approach wouldn’t necessitate changes to the blockchain itself, and as zero-knowledge proofs evolve, it would become simpler.

Note: This exchange illustrates the complexities surrounding L2 security in Ethereum, highlighting ongoing debates that impact the future of blockchain technologies.

You may also be interested in:

• Ethereum Sharks and Whales Are Back: What Does it Mean for ETH’s Price?
• 110-Year-Old Retail Giant Bealls to Accept Meme Coins and Stablecoins in Stores
• Spot Solana (SOL) ETF Gets Regulatory Green Light in Hong Kong