
Garantex, Russian Crypto Exchange, Rebrands as Grinex After Shutdown, Says Global Ledger
After a rapid shutdown, Garantex has allegedly rebranded as Grinex, with evidence suggesting a direct connection between the two exchanges.
After less than two weeks under scrutiny from global law enforcement, Garantex, a Russian cryptocurrency exchange linked to illicit activities, has reportedly transformed into Grinex. This information stems from a recent investigation by Global Ledger, a Swiss blockchain analysis firm, which highlights the continuity between the two entities through both on-chain and off-chain data.
Key Insights:
- Global Ledger indicates that Garantex’s rebranding as Grinex has capitalized on some of its existing resources, including moving assets to wallets controlled by Grinex.
- CEO Lex Fisun from Global Ledger reported on signs of significant user activity and interface similarities between Grinex and its predecessor, Garantex.
Though the findings of Global Ledger are so far not unanimously outwardly validated by other firms, Andrew Fierman from Chainalysis has seen substantial indicators that reinforce these claims, including a recent statement from Sergey Mendeleev, who humorously suggested that any resemblance to Garantex was coincidental.
In the broader context, this scenario is a reminder of regulatory challenges faced by authorities as crypto exchanges frequently evade sanctions through rebranding. Historically, exchanges that have been sanctioned or shut down often introduce new identities to continue operations, as evidenced in the cases of other notable exchanges in the past.
The Complexity of Sanctions:
- The rapid transformation of Garantex exemplifies the ongoing predicament faced by law enforcement in cracking down on non-compliant crypto exchanges. Ari Redbord from TRM Labs notes the imminent likelihood of other high-risk exchanges stepping up to fill the void left by Garantex.
Providing a window into the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges and the persistent act of evasion, this event stands as a notable case in the ongoing saga of digital finance.